Tag Archives: Gordon Lee Day

A simple lesson for NOM supporters.

Dear Karen, Jennifer and Gordon,

Excuse me for noticing the extreme amount of butthurt you seem to be experiencing over our recent blog posts that mention yourselves. We found it truly stunning that you are happy to accuse us of bullying for publicising your bullying. As highlighted here;

NOManiacs 180113b


Can we just clarify something in extreme detail, seeing as you don’t seem to comprehend the purpose of this blog?

Our mission statement is clear. We exist to highlight the anti-gay hatred displayed by the National Organization for Marriage, and that of their followers. Such speech is directly taken from the NOM Facebook page, which is a public social networking site. Any comments made therein are henceforth public.

Please don’t act so offended as if we’ve done something wrong. We haven’t. We are simply bringing to further public attention your obvious dislike and denigration of the LGBT community. You have chosen to share your personal anti-gay, homophobic hate speech with approximately 27,000 plus people on the NOM Facebook page. Why you are so aggrieved that we are sharing it with people who don’t share your viewpoint?

As far as we can tell, you were hoping to say such hateful things about homosexuals in a private capacity. You are obviously concerned about your homophobic comments being noticed by friends and family who may be gay. To that, we say the following.

Tough shit. You chose to share such personal feelings in a public forum. You knew full well the meaning and implications of your words. That is your prerogative. If you don’t want people you know to see your hidden personal feelings about them, then might we suggest you don’t actually make themDitto for liking posts. If you like hate speech, you obviously agree with the content.

Feel free to report us. We find the hypocrisy of you loudly trumpeting free speech when posting homophobic messages on Facebook while demanding everyone report us for passing on said ‘free speech’ truly hilarious. It also highlights your obvious cowardice and unwillingness to stand by what you said. In whining in such an obvious manner, you further undermine your own cause.

You got caught. Get over it. Stop posting hate-speech or learn to live with the consequences. Just so you know, we haven’t been asked to remove anything by WordPress. They obviously disagree with you.

You’re dismissed.

Gordon Lee Day loses it spectaculary on the NOM page, and Jim Slade – aka Darren – spouts verbal diarrhoea

After the spectacular effort that was yesterday – 19 Dec 2012 – that saw us not only fire well past 25,000 blog hits – award yourselves a medal and 100 bonus points – but also saw our busiest day ever, I was planning to chill out today and play 360 in my underpants listening to a bit of heavy metal. And I was. Until I was tipped off by a previously featured – in a positive sense – poster on the NOM page that he was attracting poisonous barbs there.

Now, I couldn’t see the insults in question. Why? Because they were made by old NOManiacs foaming-mouth lunatic Gordon Lee Day, who in his incredibly insular world blocks ANYONE – and I’m not joking here, literally anyone – who voices a dissenting opinion from his. He must enjoy shouting into caves if all he likes hearing is the same thing over and over. And no, that was not a rude metaphor about his wife’s nether regions. Simply for the fact I don’t think there’s a woman around who could stand to be near him.

Anyhoo, Gordon was  engaged in a battle of wits – well, a one-sided ass-kicking of wits in which he was on the receiving end – with previously mentioned WeMustDissent – WMD for short, who is fast growing in favour with us here at NOManiacs. The following comprises a list of angry insults and increasing frustration for Mr. Day, who in the past has contributed nothing but this to NOM’s Facebook page.

NOManiacs 201212

Rant 1

NOManiacs 201212b

Rant 2

I hope everyone else noticed, like I did. the excoriating irony of Gordon calling someone a bully and in the same breath telling them they are going to hell. Also note the typing, spacing and capitalisation getting worse, and picture in your head him frothing at the mouth in increasing measures.

NOManiacs 201212c

Rant 3

NOManiacs 201212d

Rant 4

This is the kind of hate speech that NOM not only encourages, but has created, fostered and unleashed onto the world. Usually employing people who don’t know they are being played – simply put, the Christian sheeple. The following character – who to anyone with half a modicum of sense can tell is not just fake but there to troll – and doing it in a hyperbolic fashion – joined in the early hours of the 19 Dec 2012. This was one of there first posts. Guess who still believes, 36 hours on, that they are still genuine?

NOManiacs 201212f

Hyperbole overload.

Poor Gordon. He must have thought he’d found a soul mate. Can anyone reference me the study showing the religious right having, on average, lower IQ’s? Thanks.

Moving on to someone who usually infests the ‘1,000,000 Strong Against Gay Marriage’ page on Facebook. Except it isn’t 1,000,000. It’s 1. Just him. On his own. Chatting with loads of gay people – cough*closeted*cough. Welcoming to NOManiacs the indescribable buffoon that is Jim Slade. Except that’s not his real name. His real name is Darren Barber. He accidentally replied to a post addressed to Jim with his real account. We’ve shown him the screencap countless times. He’s that intellectually challenged that he still refutes it. Yes. He really is that dumb.

Now it seems Jim/Darren has turned his attentions to the NOM page. Previously, Darren/Jim has argued that gays shouldn’t get married because it serves no benefit to society and is immoral – despite him claiming not to be Christian. Here is Jarren/Dim chipping with his tuppence worth – and believe is, it’s not even worth that…

NOManiacs 201212e

Can we point out that no-one – correct, NO-ONE – brought up the issue of civil race rights on that thread. At all. Dim brought this subject up entirely on his own, then claimed to have explained it fully. On other pages, he has referenced it, and brought up the whole ‘choice’ issue. Which still isn’t an argument for denying equal civil rights. Then he goes name-calling. Yes. He REALLY is that stupid…

Thanks for reading.

Brightest Blessings x