Tag Archives: Glinda Henderson Spivey

NOM responds to this blog’s claim they rarely focus on anything but SSM. Their followers display ignorance of NOM’s purpose of existence. Then talk about SSM

Would it be egotistical to think that in response to this blog, NOM posted a link in rebuttal, using a claim – surprisingly recent as well given their last dishonest attempt – by referencing a post by one Ryan Anderson, in which he claims that Conservatives don’t exclusively focus on SSM. As you can see from their FB page, it looks as though they are making the claim about their own page.

NOManiacs 121212a

As anyone who has ever spent time on NOM’s Facebook wall will know that this claim is nothing but utter tosh. Until we highlighted it, 95 per cent or more of their posts discussed nothing other than SSM. And far be it from them to actually use their OWN words to address the claims we raised – no, they had to borrow someone else’s, pass them off as their own, and still fail to acknowledge their problem.

You also need to bear in mind that NOM was set up to combat the legal recognition of SSM. This fact is still up on their ‘About’ section. See below;

NOManiacs 121212e

NOM’s admission that they are attempting to legally class homosexuals as second-class citizen – and the reason why they are close to being labelled as an official hate group.

When someone highlighted the above to a gentleman named Jared Olar, he appeared very reluctant to acknowledge this statement, despite it being himself who brought up the subject!! The screencap below highlights his stubbornness to accept this fact;

NOManiacs 121212d

Please also notice Jared’s admission that he doesn’t consider homosexual people or couples to have gender. And that he appears to think that legally keeping them as second-class citizens is justified…

That said, it didn’t stop their followers chiming in with the same old tired lines;

NOManiacs 121212b

Never gets old, does it? Neither does maths that not even Stephen Hawking could logically explain. If anyone has an answer to the strange, and quite frankly baffling, claim that Jerry Hamilton makes,  please let us know…

NOManiacs 121212c

Lunatic-level mathematics aside, it wouldn’t be a NOM thread without at least one person flagrantly denouncing and verbally abusing homosexual people. Same shit, different day;

NOManiacs 121212f1

And because we believe in the fairness of labeling ALL people who associate themselves with a homophobic post, here are the three who, at time of posting, had ‘liked’ this vile rant.

NOManiacs 121212f2

Note that Al had to like his own post to give the appearance more people agreed with him. Trust me, Al, it failed.

WARNING – The content of the following post may shock you in much the same way it shocked me. I recommend you swallow all liquids – for your laptop’s safety – before continuing.

NOManiacs 121212g

I could honestly not believe my eyes, but, yes, this is the same Clarence Warren who has (dis)graced these pages so often before…

ATTENTION BRIAN BROWN AND MAGGIE GALLAGHER – If one of your most notorious, obnoxious, obstinate homophobic posters is actually challenging the very nature of your page, then you are doing something very wrong indeed. He has highlighted, much like we have, that NOM appears to be doing nothing for marriage other than trying to deny it to a section of society based on little more than Bible rhetoric, which is a clear violation of the Constitution.

What surprised us most of all was Clarence’s frank admission that if DOMA is ruled unconstitutional then NOM, and all it stands for, will become obsolete – and we here at NOManiacs hope that with that ruling it will also be finally classed as an official hate group – and this may be why NOM are shifting their focus away from anti-gay sentiments. Stupid as they often are in getting caught out with their photoshopping, lies and manipulation, the one thing they are clever about is getting money out of people. They obviously realise that a staunch anti-gay stance is not in keeping with public opinion, and if they keep on this track then their incomes may dramatically decrease.

Editors note; Clarence, though it begrudges this author to say so, you have actually made a very valid point that I’m sure not only the readers of this post will muse upon but also Maggie and Brian. Whether they recognise the damage they have been doing is, however, another matter.

 

Thank you for reading x

New faces, same old rhetoric on the NOM boards…

While this blog has oft-digressed from it’s initial objective of highlighting the lies and misinformation published about gay people by the National Organisation for Marriage to concentrate on certain individuals and their sometimes goofy, sometimes worryingly batshit-insane ramblings, I feel it is time to highlight the exact sort of gay-hate fostered on NOM’s Facebook page, as well as on their blog. I have to say – and I’m a bit disappointed in this – it has been a while since I took a proper look through the festering cesspool that is NOM and its followers. While the names may have changed a bit – as well as appearances by a couple of old favourites – the tired, hoary old cliches, adages and sayings remain very similar. I looked over their FB page for last month or so and found a veritable harvest – I would have used their blog but the people featured there often use a psuedonym. I will footnote each screencap if necessary. There’s also gonna be a hell of a lot of tags in this one, let me tell you..

Starting off with the good old misnomer, using biased, flawed, incomplete and non-empirical data – as per the norm – to state that children of gay parents are 35 percent worse off in school. If their peers have parents like this, no bloody wonder…

NOManiacs 061212o

And those 17 who liked this?

NOManiacs 061212p

What is worse here is that one of these people, Mr. Adams Sr, is in the US Army. I’m sure his gay peers will really respect him for this.

NOManiacs 061212q

There are more…

NOManiacs 061212r

NOManiacs 061212a

Two new NOManiacs – you see more of Clark later. I also want to hail and congratulate Amanda Lewin for her simple, yet ultimately effective, put down against Josanne. I should make her a medal or something.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See below the people who liked Josanne’s statement from the post above that homosexuals are always abominations. They’re getting tagged too. As we once said, liking it makes you equally as guilty – https://nomaniacs.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/holy-and-so-called-christians-who-stand-by-hate-speech-by-clicking-like-youre-just-as-vile/

NOManiacs 061212b

And the one you couldn’t see at the bottom. We don’t miss much here.

NOManiacs 061212c

NOManiacs 061212j

An old favourite rears his head. Surprisingly he didn’t mention anal sex or poop. Not yet anyway.

NOManiacs 061212k

Another newcomer. Duly noted and tagged, David. Hope this blog doesn’t make you sick either.

NOManiacs 061212l

Clarence brings the ‘Oh no, someone protect the darling little kiddies!!’ line. Kids these days are more accepting of gay people, Clarence. Unless they’re the ones you teach to hate other people…

NOManiacs 061212n

More preachy nonsense that has no application in law. Not that Clark thinks the law applies to him anyway.

NOManiacs 061212m

Another preachy sermon combined with the procreation argument. Not heard that before, Clark…

NOManiacs 061212i - JC like

Just so you know, the liker on this posts was the probably fictional Julia Childs.

NOManiacs 061212h - JC like

Aaron displaying his obsession with gay sex yet again, and not explaining exactly what this has to do with marriage of any variety.

NOManiacs 061212g

Aaron constantly pushes, on every thread, false and misleading statistics that 50-60 percent of gay men have AIDS. A medically qualified, and utterly brilliant, person with the name WeMust Dissent – WMD – called him out on his BS, dissected the figures and said why he was talking, quite simply put, utter bollocks. Aaron still didn’t listen…

NOManiacs 061212f

More badly spelled and preachy nonsense about the harmful ‘Pray Away the Gay’ spiel. If you ever needed proof that the fundamentally religious have lower average IQ’s, here it is.

NOManiacs 061212e

Apparently John is of the feeling that gay people aren’t human. The feeling is mutual, John.

NOM Supporters Insist LGBT Community Responsible for FRC Shooting; NOM Supporters Echo Same Sentiment That Got FRC Classified as a Hate Group.

We agree that the shooting at the Family Research Council was tragic and not the answer. While we were gathering details about the shooting, National Organization for Marriage within hours was using the shooting to paint the LGBT community as responsible and use it to their advantage. NOM even pointed fingers at the Southern Poverty Law Center over its classification of the FRC as a legitimate hate group – calling on it to drop that classification. NOM’s supporters, well-fed on Chick-Fil-A sandwiches, starting posting ridiculously homophobic comments, some that were removed by Facebook. The recurring theme – ‘homosexuals are perverts’ and that their ‘attempts at marriage are futile.’ In the end, their comments are painting an even grimmer picture of the National Organization for Marriage who in recent weeks has become so desperate – supporting Chick-Fil-A (when they insist on companies remaining neutral on the marriage issue – yet insist its supporters boycott Starbucks and General Foods). Now they want their sister organization, Family Research Council to not be considered a hate group. Yet, FRC has equated the LGBT community with ‘perverts’ and ‘pedophiles.’ And surprisingly (sarcasm), NOM supporters are echoing that same sentiment that got FRC classified as a hate group.

Image

Homosexuality isn’t illegal. But this NOM supporter thinks so.

Image

Image
Rick McCarrell insists the “ss” (Same-Sex supporters) are the ones to blame. Yet, if you remember, Rick McCarrell participated in a 4-hour rant about homosexuality and anal sex. You can read it here.

Image

Image

Image
Lexi Hastings, a resident NOM supporter, has equated the LGBT community to the Taliban. She has also thumbed up homophobic comments that basically state gays are solely responsible for AIDS and spread the disease on purpose. Recently, she attacked a gay couple by stating her daughter’s marriage, which she just attended, was real and theirs was not. (see below)

Image

Image
Somehow Kristin Small assumes she is the authority on what constitutes a marriage. Yet, she does not issue marriage licenses, only insults.

Image

Image

Image
Image
Anne Miller has a theory on gay suicides – the ones bullying aren’t to blame! How ridiculous. She insists that being gay is the cause of one’s suicide – not the people, her people and NOM. This blog documents many homophobic/bullying comments. A couple of years ago, one supporter even championed herself as encouraging gay people to commit suicide. You can read about that here. Kristin Small adds that “EVERYONE of those children were sexually abused at some point in their lives.” Wow. Just wow.

Image

Image

Image
Once again, the focus returns on the anus. Anuses and glory for God in the same comment. Yet, still hate speech.

Image
Claiming her bigoted comments don’t make her a hater. It does, Glinda Henderson Spivey. Reread the comment above this one.

Image
Blatant racism here.

Image
Funny how the KKK was brought up. There was a NOM supporter a few months back cutting and pasting from a white supremacist site. You can read it here.

Image
Equating gay people to pedophiles. Yawn. However, this is common sentiment of the NOM supporters and the criteria that enabled SPLC’s classification of FRC as a hate group.

Image

Image
More propaganda regarding the LGBT community as ‘perverts’ and ‘pedophiles.’ To make her homophobic banter seem like “scholarly discussion,” Anne Miller posts a link. Where are they finding this stuff?! Why are they that concerned with gay peoples’ lives?

Image
Umm, what?

Glinda Henderson Spivey and Rick Ritchie bully a marriage equality supporter who is legally married to a person of the same-sex. Where is the respect?