Monthly Archives: January 2012

(Re)-Introducing Randy Dyer. Hypocrite, gay-basher and all-round homophobe.

To those of us who have spent many weeks, nay months, perhaps years, fighting NOM and their crazed and deluded band of followers, some of us may have had encounters with Randy Dyer. For those of you not familiar with this cretinous, cowardly individual, please enjoy the following summary.

Randy loves to patrol the anti-gay message boards 24/7 in the hope that someone, gay or not (though we at NOManiacs suspect preferably gay) will speak to him. When they do, they are met with a hostility usually seen by primitive tribes when outsiders invade their lands. When asked questions to prove his standpoint, he merely throws out unfounded, baseless and unprovable accusations. They are met with claims that they are “bashing” him, and being hypocritical. One long-time gay rights advocate has been asking for examples of said bashing for months and is still waiting.

To give you an example of this individuals mindset, the following screencaps were taken within the space of just TWO HOURS on NOM’s Facebook page. I’d offer a prize for the winner of ‘Spot The Hypocrisy’, but I’d end up as generous as Santa Claus on speed…



Randy has been told, numerous times, that people exactly like him and NOM are stopping gay people from living their lives how they wish – by being legal equivalents to him and his ‘wife’ and to be equally as happy with the one they love. He’s yet to get the message.


Randy likes to push the message that to allow SSM would mean allowing polygamy (when in fact it would damage such a campaign), as well as (with certain others – Nan Waters being one) that paedophilia would be allowed. We’ve all seen this slippery slope argument before, and despite being told that homosexuality is legal, and paedophilia isn’t, he doesn’t quite seem to get the message. Continuing…


Randy appears to have the belief that because one is gay, and loves someone of the same sex, that one has no rights. NOM’s tactics work yet again. As is another one previously mentioned;


See what I mean?


Note how Randy claims we are “bashing” him? Bear that in mind when you see the next post;


The SSM argument, it appears in Randy’s eyes, is “garbage”. More?


I wonder if Randy will dare reply on this blog why he claims we are bashing him while he is calling us, and our fight for equality, “garbage”. Moving on:


So no matter what argument you offer him, he will refute and ignore it. No matter the credibility behind it. Shame.


Apparently it does “effect” (sic) his life. Apparently he believes that the majority can vote on the rights of the minority and is somewhat upset about that. Sorry. Not really the way things work any more…


What goes around, comes around, Randy…


Then again, saying that gay people aren’t even human beings? Pretty low, Randy. Want us to continue? No? Sorry.


Above, we see Randy’s typical response to someone who has responded in a respectful manner to him. No winning with this guy, is there?

Really Randy? Care to explain the screencaps from this blog post?


WE are filled with hate, Randy? Why did you say what you did above? Any explanations?

Wise words Randy. Maybe you should take note of them…?


We’ve given you answers Randy. Whether you choose to read and/or understand them is down to you.


Need we say more?

Randy basically lays it out as he sees it. He thinks we don’t deserve any right. But I think we all knew that. Watch out for more from Randy and his bestest buddy Michael Wolfe shortly 🙂

NOM posts about protecting marriage. Followers talk about gay sex and demeaning homosexuals

What else can be said about this? We’ve covered it before. It seems they never change. NOM (for once) posted about other matters relating to marriage other than how gay couples are trying to destroy it. How did their followers reply? Well, see for yourself. Look for the admission from Clarence “The Scribe” Warren that MALE gay sex intrigues him, and another cameo appearance from Master “Steven” Bates. Plus, more talk about faeces and bottoms and so forth. Do these people EVER think of ANYTHING else?

I believe this is “Clarence” explaining away his fascination with male gay sex by claiming his mind is “enquiring”. Anyone else feeling “enquiring” about his sex life? Anyone? No? Moving on…


Author edit 12/12 – If anyone wants to find ‘Thomas Byron’ and highlight the fact he called it wrong, be my guest…

I know the above screencap isn’t really related to LGBT issues and gay marriage. I just wanted to highlight an up and coming NOManiacs star in “Thomas Byron” (no, no prizes for guessing he’s a fake, sorry!). Not only is he labouring under the misapprehension that Obama is Muslim but he also wants to cast him int the fiery pit of ‘hell’. Hope you’re feeling the Christian ‘love’, people. All the above were capped on 09 January 2012 or posted on that date. The following are from 10 January 2012:

Anyone else see the hypocrisy? No? Look a little harder. It’s there…

The likes on this were Thomas Byron and Steven Bates. No surprise there then…

And now, something from the faceless “Nino Brunet”. Having had run-ins with this person before, your admin can tell you that this is quite an unsavoury character. See the next three posts…




Anyone else disgusted by the actions of NOM’s follower whose posts were not only allowed to remain on the page for almost a full day but are still there to the time of posting? NOM doesn’t approve of anti-gay slurs? Riiiiiiiiiight. And there’s more…


Master “Steven” Bates, not at his finest, but certainly at his most desultory. NOM have known about this individual (your admin having contacted them directly several times about his posts) for some time. Is he banned? Nope. More actively encouraged to post. James Avery for you next, ladies and gentlemen (If you can stomach any more)…

Methinks he’s not going to be voting Democrat in the upcoming election…

And we end (for that day at least) with Clarence  yet again revisiting his fascination with the anus, anal sex, and people’s private sexual relations. Please feel free to comment on whether or not you obsess as much over another complete stranger’s sexual life.

And now, a couple from the last 24 hours:


Roberta is an old name when it comes to anti-gay hatred. That said, last year your admin witnessed Roberta ganging up with several others (the infamous SN being one of them), relentlessly haranguing a Welsh gay woman who was raped some years ago and dared to have an abortion for a child she neither wanted nor could have loved. They actually sided with the rapist’s rights to have a child. Your NOM followers at work, people.

And so, my friends, another blog post ends. Apologies that it was so long – I really should post more often but unlike NOM and their followers, I don’t have infinite time on my hands. Hope you enjoyed it and keep your eyes peeled for more…

Hypocrisy, and liking one’s own posts. Lesson one with Prof. Rick Ryan

It’s one thing to be caught out trying to be indignantly righteous when in fact one is displaying hysterical hypocrisy, such as NOM’s new sex-commenter has, but to do so with no support but oneself should really give you an indication of exactly how popular you are.

Presenting Rick Ryan, who went on a several-comment long rant about anal sex, homosexuals having sex, and sex in general, then appeared to shriek, in a lovely falsetto voice, that he had no interest in what people do in the privacy of their own bedrooms. Rick’s denial is right here:

He has “NEVER CARED” about people’s sex lives, apparently. I would recommend Mr. Ryan see someone specialising in short-term amnesia. Note the time lapse between the posts below and his denial:

Just to confirm, it took two hours from Rick banging on (pardon the inadvertent but nonetheless well-placed pun) about people’s sex lives – and yes, all of those likes on Rick’s posts are from Rick himself – I checked – to flat out denial about having “NEVER CARED” about said sex lives. I also noted how he had a dig, twice using the stock-NOM word of “perverse”, at gay people in general. NOM’s standards at work, ladies and gentlemen.

That said, at least Clarence Warren, who appears to think that his ramblings on the NOM Wall somehow constitute making him a “Scribe”, is less in denial about his obsession with male gay sex. You’d have thought, what with him being such a confirmed, non-chosen heterosexual, that he might, for once, think about FEMALE gay sex? He never seems to mention it. This seems to be a recurring problem with many of the male anti-gay posters that NOM so seemingly endorses on their wall. We all know what homophobia REALLY means, don’t we? See for yourself:

Moral lesson of the day – if you’re  going to be a hypocrite who can’t get anyone to like what he posts, don’t post it. If you can’t get over your obsession with male gay sex, either seek help or have some. Either way, you think about it more than we do…

New Year, same old NOM…

My first thanks are to the previous editor of this blog who has done a wonderful job exposing the hate-machine that is the National Organisation for Marriage and their often-foaming, semi-rabid, faeces-obsessed racist followers. They feel that they have done as much as they can with the limited time they have and kindly passed the mantle on to me shortly into the New Year. I hope I can do this blog as much justice as they did. Right, on to business.

With a New Year and Resolutions to be made, it may have been a little optimistic to expect NOM’s followers to maybe show a little more tolerance and respect towards their fellow human beings, in-keeping with the love and tolerance that their Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ asked. Actually, it was very optimistic. Foolishly so, in fact. To be honest, anyone who realistically expected as such must have been smoking something illicit.

NOM’s recent post targets a Canadian Gay Magazine editor, helpfully posting a link to its blog with a picture suggesting we are all trying to “indoctrinate children” (see below):

From NOM's Blog, 12th January 2012

NOM suggesting all gays want to "indoctrinate" people.

Most people would call it “educating”. Seems NOM isn’t very fond of education. Nor does “Daughter of Eve”, who seems, like so many of the sheeple that NOM relies upon to feed their insatiable thirst for money for expensive yet futile bus tours, 5* hotels and Maggie’s undoubtedly large grocery bill, thinks that all we’re after is to encourage people to have gay sex all day, every day:

All gays are sex maniacs? You think of it more than we do, hen...
That said, her impression of homosexual people pales when one considers Barb Chamberlain, and her comparison of gays to mentally deficient people. Thanks for that Barb:


How did the so-called “kindly” Christian followers react to this post on NOM’s facebook wall? By pretty much castigating us to an eternal pit of fiery oblivion lest we do exactly what they say and have sex with who they deem fit. Much in the same way a pimp would. If he was a pimp employed by the WBC, that is. Suzanne Reed Miranda, thank you for your assertions that we are all unhappy, miserable no-hopers with no chance of ever living a fruitful life without your sole intervention, but I think you’ll find many of us are happy with our lives and partners, jobs and lives in general. The unhappy ones which you speak of are no doubt unhappy because you keep posting and pushing messages like the ones below:


Can I make a very polite request? Not just to the people featured in this post but to all of NOM’s followers? We are not seeking marriage in your churches – just the right to be treated equally under the law. Your religion is solely that. Yours. It has no place in the law and as such cannot be used to dictate or argue against our legally recognised equality. Practice your faith. Enjoy it. Try love people as your supposed saviour said. You might just learn a few things…